Hip Resurfacing Vs Hip Replacement 2016
In a conventional hip replacement the pain from a diseased hip is relieved by replacing the ball and the socket.
Hip resurfacing vs hip replacement 2016. Since its fda approval in 2006 more than 3 000 hip. Unlike traditional hip replacement surgery resurfacing does not remove as much of your leg bone. Hip resurfacing is a less invasive approach to hip replacement and involves removing only the affected portions of the hip joint. This article talks about some of the major differences between hip resurfacing and total hip replacement.
Hip replacement alleviates pain by removing the affected bones and cartilage and replacing it with a prosthetic implant that imitates the function of the joint. Results from long term data show that it can last just as long or longer than traditional hip replacement in young high demand patients especially men. Importantly hip resurfacing needn t be looked at as a temporary procedure inevitably leading to hip replacement down the road. The birmingham hip resurfacing is the answer to younger patients with severe hip pain due to arthritis.
Additionally it also explores some of the possible advantages and disadvantages of hip resurfacing over hip replacement. These patients are too young for a total hip replacement because of the severe limitations after the surgery. Hip resurfacing is an alternative technology to total hip replacement that is aimed at treating painful conditions of the hip in younger active patients.